Oct 30

The city of Burnsville, MN got so many complaints about the foul odor and taste in their drinking water that they brought in an outside water consultant to figure out what’s causing the problem.

One resident described the city’s tap was as “Chlorinated, dirty, smelly, scummy pond water”.

Independent testing confirmed chlorine levels at .7ppm (parts per million) which is about the same as a swimming pool.  Most communities in the Twin Cities have chlorine levels that range from .3ppm – .5ppm.

The water problems seem to come from a new city water treatment plant that re-uses waste water from a Burnsville mining company.  Officials say the cause of the foul odor is from build-up of algae and organic compounds.

Officials say as bad as the water might smell, it doesn’t pose any health risks.  The city is working on the problem, but unfortunately, it can’t happen overnight.

“It’s perfectly safe to drink. There’s no concerns with that. You might not like the smell or the taste at this time, but it is getting better,” said Burnsville City Council Member Dan Gustafson.

Burnsville, like many suburbs in the Twin Cities, does a good job at keeping their tap water “safe”, but not necessarily “delicious”.  More and more homeowners and businesses are dissatisfied with tap water because of this.

The water filtration and purification systems we carry are both environmentally-friendly and cost-effective solutions to these tap water dilemmas.  Our clients get water that is safe AND great tasting: You should too!!!

Tagged with:
Oct 12

The New York Times has compiled a dabase with data on more than 200,000 facilities that have permits to discharge pollutants and collected responses from states regarding compliance. The information in this database comes from the Environmental Protection Agency and the California State Water Resources Control Board.

 

Click here to see where Minnesota pollution comes from.

Tagged with:
Oct 09

WASHINGTON — The US Environmental Protection Agency announced on October 7 the that they will launch a comprehensive new evaluation of atrazine, one of the most widely used agricultural pesticides in the United States, to determine its effects on humans. The EPA’s plan calls for a September 2010 presentation of its evaluation, at which time the agency will seek peer review.

Atrazine is listed as a primary drinking water contaminant by the EPA. The agency now sets the maximum contaminant level (MCL) of atrazine in drinking water at 3 parts per billion (ppb) (3 micrograms per liter), but it adds that levels in excess of that pose health risks over a long period. On its Web site, the agency says, “An occasional peak concentration above 3 ppb is, therefore, not cause for concern. Rather, a long-term, consistent value above a yearly average of 3 ppb would be of concern.”

A recent investigation by The New York Times found that levels of atrazine, often applied before and after planting to control broadleaf and grassy weeds, have spiked well above the allowable maximum in many public water systems, sometimes for as much as a month at a time, but few water systems have reported those occurrences.

So it looks like Atrazine could follow in Arsenic’s footsteps, which ended up having it’s “Allowable Limit” lowered from 50ppb to 10ppb.  It makes you wonder what will be allowed 10, or 20 years from now.  What was once considered safe could be considered dangerous.

Yet another reason to bathe and drink the purest water you can.


Tagged with:
preload preload preload